Skip to main content

Resistance Training



You have to lean in when the work gets hard.

The first time I thought about this concept was in high school track. I ran cross country in high school and, while I wasn't winning any races in 6A, I was decent and I worked hard at it. I clocked a handful of sub-5-minute miles and sub-17-minute 5k's. Little brag on younger me.

High school boys 6A cross-country in Alabama in the late 90's was more competitive than you might think and we were cranking out pretty difficult workouts on a regular basis. One of everyone's least favorite workouts was 400-meter repeats. On our team, we would do a couple of miles easy to warm up, 12 400s at a sub-:60 pace, and then a couple of miles to cool down. Just to put this in perspective, a 57-second 400 is 3:48 mile pace. And we would do 12 of those. Feels crazy when I think about it now.

The easy thing (well, "easy" for a fit 17-year-old) was to go out and run 2 or 3 fast 400's. After 4 you're pretty smoked. After 5, you're not only physically smoked, but you are also realizing that you aren't even halfway done yet. 

That's when your brain starts to do funny things. It starts to wander to all the things it would rather be doing: eating chicken nuggets, or playing video games, or just sleeping. It starts to feed you all the reasons for you to stop. What's the point of all these 400's anyway? Your legs are kind of hurting.

I remember the first time I pushed back on that feeling. It was a 400-meter repeat workout and I was really in a hole around the 5th one. I almost visualized my brain becoming "unhooked" from the present moment, disconnecting me from where I was and what I was doing. I remember struggling really hard to hook my brain back into what I was doing, where I was. To not escape my discomfort. 

There was a lot of resistance. It was like trying to hook two things together that each had powerful bands pulling them in different directions. The mental act of holding those two things together, the uncomfortable moment and my focus, was much more difficult than the actual running.

But I started to notice that, when I could successfully do this, I got way more out of the work I was putting in. My body could actually learn the lessons about being faster and stronger and having more endurance which was the intention of those workouts.

This transferred to a bunch of other areas of my life as well. Intentionality and focus are, unsurprisingly, universally helpful practices. When I was learning music and how to play an instrument, staying engaged through the parts that were uncomfortable yielded the most progress. Focusing on a pattern or a passage that gave me trouble was much more productive than playing the handful of things I was already comfortable with.

Same with academics, or work, or relationships, or anything. Staying focused and present during the most uncomfortable parts has always yielded the most growth.

It is the ultimate resistance training.

(Featured art is "Sprint" by MelaniPykeArt)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Rise of the Machines

Yes, this is a post about AI, but not just about AI. This is a post about how much things have changed in the world. For brands. For consumers. For anyone who buys and/or sells anything. Which is all of us. COVID-19 changed everything, sure. We all know that by now. There are some people and businesses who are still using that as an excuse to underdeliver or deliver late. "Oh, you know, COVID" has been the apathetic battle cry for anyone not getting it done for years. It's the El Niño of a new generation. COVID forced people to get more things done online. Online shopping had been increasing gradually through Web 1.0 and Web 2.0 for years. Amazon changed the world long ago (2005) when it launched free 2-day shipping. But COVID sped that along. It forced late adopters to go online for more and more of their wants and needs. Not just random Amazon purchases anymore. Whole industries like grocery shopping and restaurant dining moved online virtually overnight. A lot of busin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Wave-Particle Duality And A Cat In A Box

Thomas Young was a notable British polymath who lived around the turn of the 19th century. His famous contribution was his double-slit experiment. While I myself am no physicist, the gist of this original 1804 experiment was that he fired a light at a board with two slits in it and noted how the light hit a solid board behind the first board. If light were just made of particles (which it is: photons) then you would expect to just see two solid strips of light on the second board where photons passed through the slits and hit the board behind. What he found, instead, was an interference pattern implying that light was actually a wave. But it is also a particle. This was the beginning of the idea of wave-particle duality or the concept that every particle can be described either as a particle or a wave. As our technology has gotten better and the scientific questions we ask have gotten tougher, hundreds of versions of the original double-slit experiment have been performed and, in many ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Founders Aren't Forever

  When founders take on outside capital, we are ceding control.  How much control and under what circumstances is negotiated by lawyers and written down in long documents full of legalese that will, after much hand-wringing, get signed and stuffed in a vault only to be dragged out in extreme scenarios. Good or bad, it’s an extreme scenario that sends you running to the docs. Break glass in case of emergency. But we ARE ceding control. We are exchanging it for opportunity. Most founders aren’t getting rich off the fundraising process. Yes, there are exceptions but, mostly, we are trying to take a great idea and make it bigger and more meaningful. We are trying to get a product or service that we think the world needs and will love actually distributed to the world or, at least, to a broader community. Every founder who has taken outside capital has had that conversation with themselves of “Well I’d rather own 60% (or whatever) of something big than 100% of something small.” So ...
Post a Comment
Read more